Debate Fallout- Enter Sandman

So the first debate is over, and universal response is that Mitt Romney won the debate. I watched, and I do believe that Romney did indeed “win” the debate. I also believe that Obama “lost” that debate as much as Romney won it.

Romney was the aggressor throughout the night. To use a boxing analogy Romney pursued the President throughout the night, cutting off the ring and getting off first most of the night. What happened to the President?

I think the President was thrown off stride early by the Romney assertions, totally false, that his tax plan would not cost $5 trillion, would not give additional tax benefit to the upper brackets, and was revenue neutral. Obama seemed befuddled, and unable to strike back at the clearly false assertions. Romney’s tax position seems to be that his plan is what he says it is, and you will just have to wait until after the election to get the details.

Romney took it to the President on health care, making assertions that again were totally false. Romney’s assertion that his “plan” covered those with pre-existing conditions has already been walked back by his own campaign after Romney made the same claim a few weeks back. The truth is that he has no plan for people with pre-existing conditions, claiming that the market will take care of it. Romney continually calls for repeal of ObamaCare, but NEVER makes suggestions for what will come in its place. He seemed to me to indicate that he favored a return to the pre-reform system, which was a disaster for the country. Romney has also walked back the Paul Ryan plans on Medicare, assuring all that there will be no change, and no savings, from any Romney Medicare changes. That must be shocking news to the Republican base.

The Romney plan on the budget, as explained last night, would lower the deficit by cutting PBS. He essentially indicated that all of the spending cuts he has advocated for by saying he would sign the House Republican budget were off the table. He even claimed that he would not be cutting education spending. Totally false.

So in the final analysis President Obama will need to raise his game, and do so substantially. As folks look at what impact this will have they may look at national polls, but I think the swing state polls is where our gaze should go. Florida and Virginia are two states where polling had showed virtual ties, and the strong Romney showing could tip them, for the time, into the Romney column. I think the campaign narrative, overnight, has changed, putting Romney right back in a game he was on the verge of losing. The Obama campaign, if they lose this thing, will need to look in the mirror and admit that they had the wrong strategy for this debate. Mike Murphy called it the “Sandman” strategy: “put em to sleep, agree, and run out the clock”. Sorry Team Obama, wrong strategy. Romney was better prepared, crisper in presentation, not afraid to tell a whopper or two, and the aggressor throughout. Team Romney got it right, and Team Obama made a bad error. They should begin preparations for the second debate by firing John Kerry as the Romney stand in.

Posted in National News | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Scott Brown Effect- Numbers in The First Essex Senate District

We have examined the statewide polling numbers in the Elizabeth Warren-Scott Brown race in earlier posts, with those numbers showing a difficult (but not impossible) road ahead for Senator Brown. But different regions of the Commonwealth have differing voting patterns, with Senator Brown generally doing better in suburban areas, and Martha Coakley performing better in urban areas. Will that pattern hold? It will likely, in a framework sense, hold true. The numbers, in a presidential election year, will obviously change as far as turnout. Will it change the traditional pockets of geographic strength that the parties have shown? I think some of the fundamentals will hold. How did Scott Brown fare against Martha Coakley in the First Essex Senate District? The numbers please.

The First Essex District has Amesbury, Newburyport, Salisbury, Merrimac, Haverhill, Methuen, North Andover (4 precincts). These numbers are from the 2010 special election. The North Andover numbers are town-wide, not just the precincts in the First Essex District.

Turnout- Scott Brown- Martha Coakley- Other

Amesbury 51% 3480- 57% 2543- 42% 70- 1%

Salisbury 51% 1927- 64% 1061- 35% 42- 1%

Merrimac 62% 1651- 60% 1042- 38% 37- 1%

Newburyport 65% 4174- 49% 4266- 50% 57- 1%

Methuen 49% 9171- 65% 4837- 34% 117- 1%

Haverhill 45% 11069- 60% 7259- 39% 202- 1%

North Andover 60% 7018- 64% 3826- 35% 80- 1%

Total Scott Brown 38,490- 60% Martha Coakley 24,834- 39% Other-605- 1%

Posted in Methuen, State News | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The Scott Brown- Elizabeth Warren Debate

Here is the full video of the Senator Scott Brown-Elizabeth Warren debate. Much to take out, but how about the resistance to Simpson-Bowles by Scott Brown, with a deferential nod to the balanced approach of that panel by Elizabeth Warren. In fact I think it would be fair to say that both candidates are opposed to the specific recommendations contained within that report. Is that fair? Judge for yourself.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Posted in U.S. Senate Race | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

More Chads Please- Suffolk in FLA

Suffolk University and pollster David Paleologos have just released polling from the all important swing state of Florida, with Barack Obama holding a very narrow edge in that State. From the Suffolk Press Release.

“On the eve of the first debate, both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney know the importance of each percentage point in a state like Florida,” said David Paleologos, director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center in Boston. Not only are the remaining undecided voters critical, but so are the voters of all the third-party candidates here – and there are many.”

Obama led by a 46% to 43% margin, with 7% undecided. The survey has a margin of error of 4%, leaving this as a very tight race. Minor and third party candidates are pulling about a little more than 3%, which as we learned from the Ralph Nader experience, could be vital.

Libertarian Gary Johnson, Green Party nominee Jill Stein, and Peace and Freedom Party nominee Roseanne Barr were each favored by 1 percent of voters polled. One or more voters, but less than 1 percent, chose Peta Lindsay (Party for Socialism and Liberation), Tom Hoefling (American Independent Party), or Ross C. “Rocky” Anderson (Justice Party of Florida).

I guess we better get ready for some more chad counting in FLA. This is a state where the debates may make enough of an impact to actually tip the balance in favor of one candidate or the other. I would venture to say that we will see some real dollars poured into FLA by both sides in the coming weeks.

Another great job by David Paleologos and Suffolk University.

In a very important U.S. Senate race incumbent Democratic Senator Bill Nelson leads Republican Connie Mack by a 40% to 34% margin. In that race two independent candidates together are showing 5%, another situation where a tight race will be impacted by these candidacies. (Chris Borgia at 4%, Bill Gaylor at 1%) Borgia appears to be a Libertarian, although he is not running as one. Look for some real hard hitting negativity between Nelson and Mack.

Posted in National News | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Angus King Holds On

Former Maine Governor, and now independent candidate for U.S. Senate, Angus King, has been put under a fusillade of fire from national Republicans looking to knock him off. King has been under attack for his support of wind energy, and some alleged involvement in specific wind projects that received public support. The attacks have had some negative impact, but King started with such a big lead that he continues to hold on. The survey please!

King is still showing 50% support in a three way race, a great number, and one that is below where he was before the Republican barrage of about $2 million in negative ads. Republican Charlie Summers is at 28%, and Democrat Cynthia Dill is at 12%. 10% remain undecided. I think you can chalk this one up folks. The question of where King will caucus is still open, but I believe ultimately he will caucus with the Democrats.

In the Presidential race Barack Obama is crushing Mitt Romney by a 52% to 36% margin, with 9% undecided. You can chalk that one up as well, although Maine splits its electoral votes, awarding two to the statewide winner, and one each to the winner in each of the two Congressional Districts. In the Second Congressional District the Obama lead is only 5%, leaving open the possibility of Mitt Romney gaining one of Maine’s four electoral votes.

A referendum question, which would legalize same sex marriage in Maine, leads by a 57% to 36% margin, with 7% undecided. That looks like a clear win for marriage equality in Maine!

Here is a sample of the Republican attacks on King.

Posted in National News | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Tisei Pulls Ahead

The most competitive Congressional contest in Massachusetts is the Richard Tisei-John Tierney race. Congressman Tierney has been barraged with an onslaught of negative publicity over his family and the gambling issue, and outside money has been deployed in large amounts to continue the assault on Tierney. It may be having a real impact.

The Boston Globe, in the same survey showing Elizabeth Warren leading Scott Brown, shows Richard Tisei opening up a six point lead on John Tierney, 37% to 31%, with 30% undecided. Tierney is polling below 60% with Democrats, a fatal number if it holds. (54% Tierney, 10% Tisei, 34% undecided). Tisei has a big lead with independents, at 39% to 23%, with 30% undecided. With Republicans Tisei is at 70%, and that number will likely go up by election time.

Republicans have identified Tierney early on as a vulnerable Democratic incumbent, and have put in some big dollars to try to oust him. The Young Guns PAC has poured about $900,000 into this race, and the NRCC close to $1 million. The Salem News is reporting that Democratic Super PAC “House Majority” has pulled a $630,000 media buy designed to help Tierney. That is not a good sign for the Tierney campaign.

The Salem News story has Congressman Tierney attacking the methodology of the Globe poll, claiming that it over-sampled Republicans. I guess Republicans are not the only folks griping about survey methodology. I don’t see much merit in the methodology argument, no matter which side is making the complaint. I have yet to see an attack on methodology from any campaign that was listed as being ahead. Hmmmm.

The campaign has a way to go, and it is a bit too early to be writing John Tierney off, but Richard Tisei has to be encouraged by the results. The Congressional race to watch in Massachusetts.

Posted in State News | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Scalia Response

Scott Brown, in response to a David Gregory question, said that his ideal Supreme Court Justice was Antonin Scalia. I think he realized his error and tried to walk it back, but the right answer for him was Anthony Kennedy, a justice considered to be a centrist who tends to swing between the sides. When you are not willing to say that you are going to vote for Mitch McConnell for Leader I don’t believe that the Scalia response fit in with Brown’s debate strategy. Democrats were quick to pounce, and it was indeed an error by Scott Brown.

Posted in U.S. Senate Race | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Attack of the Nancy Pelosi Zombies

John Dennis, a Tea Party Republican running against Nancy Pelosi, has unveiled a new ad. It really needs work, but it is so odd that I just had to post. Don’t give up your day job John.

Posted in National News | Tagged , | Leave a comment

No Time Left for You

Paul Ryan, in an appearance on Fox News Sunday, told Chris Wallace that he “did not have the time” to explain how the Romney tax plan was “revenue neutral”. In fact Ryan refused to even say what the number was that would need to be made up to be revenue neutral. A little bit of explanation.

The Romney plan calls for a 20% across the board tax cut, with the loss of revenue being made up by the elimination of “tax breaks”. When he does discuss it Romney has a tendency to say that the tax breaks to be eliminated will be ones largely utilized by upper income taxpayers. What he never says is what tax breaks, and what income level would be impacted. Hence the Democratic charge that Romney will eliminate tax preferences that largely benefit the middle class, and in so doing raise taxes on that category. The argument has gotten a bit wonky, with even Romney supporters conceding that to make the numbers work the definition of middle class needs to be lowered. I think all agree that even if you stretch it a bit taxpayers earning between $100,000 and $200,000 would be in for a tax increase under the “Romney plan”. Want the best back and forth on this? Check out Ezra Klein’s Wonkblog over at the Washington Post.

Before you can even get to the point where we argue about elimination of tax breaks to “pay” for the tax cuts there has to be some agreement on how much we will have to make up. What is the cost of the Romney plan? In the clip Chris Wallace does not even get an opportunity to ask about the disagreements on the supporting math of tax break eliminations. He simply asked how much the Romney plan will cost as a starting point. Can’t really argue about the tax breaks until we agree on how much it is that we need to make up. Ryan will not even estimate THAT number, pointedly refusing to even give an estimate of cost to the Romney plan. He just says that there is “not enough time”.

It is quite clear that the Romney numbers simply don’t work, both from a math perspective and especially from a political perspective. Hammering income earners between $100,000 and $200,000 to provide tax breaks for folks above that, in my opinion, can’t be sold to anyone, including Republicans. You can expect the President to ask Mitt Romney to make time for the explanation at the first debate this week. No time for you will not be acceptable as a response!

http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=1869261696001&w=466&h=263Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com

Posted in National News | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

New Brown-Warren Polling, and the Mitt Romney Effect

The new Boston Globe survey on the Massachusetts U.S. Senate race came out today, showing the inexorable drift towards Elizabeth Warren that Suffolk had picked up a week or so ago. This drift comes in spite of voters having a favorable opinion of Scott Brown’s job performance. The survey please!

Elizabeth Warren leads Scott Brown by a 43% to 38% margin, with 18% still undecided. The poll margin of error was 4.4%. So the race is tight, with a big block of undecided holding the balance. Lifting the hood, in my opinion, shows the difficult road ahead for Brown. Brown leads among those voters who consider themselves “independent” by a 45% to 23% margin, which is simply not enough. This group has 18% undecided. Brown’s margin over Martha Coakley was substantially higher with independents, and in a Presidential election year he simply needs a bigger margin with independents. I discussed independents in this race, and the impact of Elizabeth Warren peeling away crossover votes from Scott Brown in an earlier post. How bad is the “Romney effect” for Scott Brown? The numbers don’t paint a pretty picture.

Obama voters support Elizabeth Warren by a 70% to 9% margin, with 20% undecided. For you folks wondering why Elizabeth Warren is doing her best to link Scott Brown with Mitt Romney and the Republican brand look no further. It is akin to throwing him an 800 pound anchor. As he looks to persuade the undecideds in his race he is looking at another ugly number, as those folks favor President Obama by a 67% to 7% margin.

The President leads his race with Mitt Romney in Massachusetts by a 57% to 30% margin, with 11% undecided. 27% is a whopping margin, and even if it narrows the dead weight of Mitt Romney is breaking Scott Brown’s back. Romney has a 60% unfavorable rating in Massachusetts, deeply underwater.

A little while back I happened to catch independent analyst Charlie Cook on Morning Joe, where he said (despite a Scott Brown lead in the polls) that Brown would have to peel off 300,000 Obama voters in order to win the race, and that we might wake up to an 8 point Warren win due to the makeup of the State. Cook seemed to be preparing the Brown supporters on the panel for the drift he knew was coming. Democrats should hold the celebrations, but if Warren can hold her own from this point forward I think the Obama tide will take Scott Brown out to sea.

Posted in U.S. Senate Race | Tagged , | Leave a comment