Democratic Unity Event

Former Democratic rivals Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama came together in Unity New Hampshire for a Democratic unity event to promote Barack Obama for President. Both were effusive in their praise of each other, as the Democrats begin the process of healing after a bruising primary battle. It was a good start to this general election effort, and Obama continues to eclipse McCain in terms of coverage. And before you start crying media bias I ran into an interesting stat yesterday. Since becoming the presumptive nominee McCain has booked one (yes that is 1) campaign event on a weekend. (Statistic from Hardball show, Chris Matthews.) Maybe McCain figures that campaigning for President is a 40 hour job. Good for Obama, bad for Republicans!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/25415076#25415076

Posted in National News | 5 Comments

Spiggot Falls Park Repairs Complete

The work is nearly complete on the rebuild of Spiggot Falls Park, which was literally torn in half during the major floods of three years ago. Yesterday we took delivery of the walk bridge that will join the two parts of the park, and it was installed succesfully. We need to do some cosmetic work, and well as pouring the cement for the bridge, but I am looking forward to a full re-opening of the park. Our DPW Director Ray Difiore and Chief Engineer Frank Russo worked hard to get us to this point. This Park was rebuilt with federal and state monies, and we thank Senator Baddour and State Rep Linda Campbell for all of their efforts in helping us with FEMA and MEMA. See you at the grand re-opening.

Spiggot Falls

Posted in Methuen | Leave a comment

Supreme Court Voids D.C. Gun Ban

In a decision that made history the U.S. Supreme Court, in a five to four decision, voided the Washington D.C. law that prohibited the ownership of handguns. The D.C. law also required that rifles and shotguns owned be kept in a state of disassembly or with a trigger lock deployed. The Court broke along ideological lines in reaching its decision. From the Washington Post:

“We hold that the District’s ban on handgun possession in the home violates the Second Amendment, as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful firearm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense,” Justice Antonin Scalia wrote. He was joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr.

The Second Amendment, Scalia said, “surely elevates above all other interests the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home.”

The opinion, the last and perhaps most anticipated ruling of the court’s current term, delivered a bold and unmistakable endorsement of the individual right to own guns. At the same time, it raised as many questions as it answered about the ability of government to restrict gun ownership to promote public safety, a point made in detailed rebuttals from the liberals on the court, both from the bench and in two lengthy dissents.

The four dissenters pointed to the potential for the widespread challenge to gun control measures due to this ruling:

Justice Stephen G. Breyer said the decision “threatens to throw into doubt the constitutionality of gun laws throughout the United States,” and he called that a “formidable and potentially dangerous” mission for the courts to undertake. He was joined by Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

From the campaign trail both candidates expressed support for the theory endorsed by the Court here, that the Second Amendment gives a guarantee of a right to individual gun ownership. But that is where the agreement ends. From John McCain:

Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), the presumptive Republican nominee, called it a “landmark victory” for Second Amendment rights and criticized his rival’s home town. “Today’s ruling . . . makes clear that other municipalities like Chicago that have banned handguns have infringed on the constitutional rights of Americans,” he said.

I wonder why Senator McCain picked out Chicago? I guess Barack Obama’s home city will be in for some scrutiny. Obama reacted cautiously, but pointed out that while supportive of an individual right in this area, he also recognizes the need for localities to be able to enforce common sense safety measures designed to promote the overall safety of its citizens. From Barack Obama:

Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.), the Democrats’ all-but-certain nominee, issued a statement saying that “I have always believed that the Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to bear arms, but I also identify with the need for crime-ravaged communities to save their children from the violence that plagues our streets through common-sense, effective safety measures.”

Justice Scalia sparred heavily with Justice Stevens over the age old argument about the meaning of the second amendment phrase “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Justice Scalia took the position for the majority that the Second Amendment confers an individual right to bear arms, and does not solely refer to a need for an organized militia.

Scalia drew on years of scholarly research to conclude that the amendment’s opening clause about the need for a ready militia was only one of the reasons that the Framers recognized what he argued was a preexisting right to arms.

“Does the preface fit with an operative clause that creates an individual right to keep and bear arms?” Scalia wrote. “It fits perfectly.”

Justice Stevens mocked that view, and engaged Scalia in an intellectual tete a tete.

Stevens rebutted Scalia in 46 pages of his own, and the two engaged in a line-by-line battle over the meaning of the amendment. “When each word in the text is given full effect, the Amendment is most naturally read to secure to the people a right to use and possess arms in conjunction with service in a well-regulated militia,” Stevens wrote, adding that it meant “no more than that.”

The Court left open some regulatory issues, and Scalia himself limited the depth of effect.

Scalia said the opinion should not be read to cast doubt on “longstanding prohibitions” on gun possession by “felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.” He added that the list was not meant to be exhaustive.

He also said the court recognized limitations on the right to keep and carry arms, and he indicated that federal bans on weapons such as machine guns may not be threatened.

I guess that individual right to bear arms stops at the machine gun level. But I wonder why. If the federal government has the authority to abridge your second amendment right to individually own a machine gun, why are localities placed in a different category? I guess I will have to read the decision to see the rationale.

Court Decision Handgun Ownership

Posted in National News | 4 Comments

Governor Patrick’s Readiness Report

I have posted the full readiness report by Governor Patrick, released today. I have not even read it as of yet so I can offer no comment, but it is here for your examination and comment.

Readiness Report

Posted in State News | 1 Comment

Katherine Lavigne named permanent Chief of Police

I will on Friday send up to the City Council the name of Katherine Lavigne to be the new permanent Chief of the Methuen Police Department. Chief Lavigne has been the acting Chief for close to a year, and in a unique and difficult situation has truly done an outstanding job. Additionally I will send to City Council the names of Thomas Fram to be Executive Captain, Gregory Gallant as Lieutenant, and Kenneth Leone as Sargent. Chief Lavigne will be Methuen’s first female Police Chief and one of a very few in the Commonwealth. With all of the issues that have been raised there were many who felt that we should go outside the Department for new leadership. I myself felt that a strong outside presence might be necessary. The new leadership of this Department showed that they can do the job from day one, and Chief Lavigne and her team, presented with an opportunity through the temporary period, have proven that day after day. My congratulations to Chief Lavigne, Captain Fram, and the entire Department.

Posted in Methuen | 3 Comments

Live Call in Show Wednesday Night

I will host my second live call in show tommorow evening at 7:30 with City Councilors Jennifer Kannan and Jeanne Pappalardo. The show will start at 7:30 p.m. on MCTV Channel 8 on Comcast. Please give me a call to talk about any subject, but try not to be rough on me. I look forward to talking with you tommorow night.

Posted in Methuen | 2 Comments

Governor Unveils Readiness Project

Governor Deval Patrick unveiled yesterday some key components of his effort to overhaul education in Massachusetts, but without specifying how the initiative would be financed. Governor Patrick has a big agenda in this field, with many stated goals sure to draw intense political scrutiny. From the Globe:

Governor Deval Patrick unveiled the first wave of his sweeping education changes yesterday, including universal prekindergarten, full-day kindergarten for all students, and a drop-out prevention program. But how he will pay for those and other initiatives proposed in his Readiness Project will remain a mystery until November.

In a press conference that had promised to deal with the fundamental question of how to pay for the 50-plus initiatives outlined in his plan, the governor instead announced the formation of a special commission to identify short-term cost savings and potential new revenue sources for education.

“Everything is on the table,” Patrick said, responding to a question about whether his proposals could mean new taxes. “Our future is at stake.”

This initiative will also advocate a statewide teachers contract to replace the existing system of each district negotiating separate contracts, and you can be sure that the teacher unions will want more detail on that. The finance task force will also look at the existing state formula under education reform, making recommendations for change that could have widespread ramifications. Any process that tinkers with the existing formula will produce political winners and losers, and I anticipate a pitched political battle regardless of how the formula gets tweaked. The Governor is provoking debate in an area that sorely needs debate and new ideas, and that is a good thing. The lack of financing ideas at this point is a cause for concern. The Governor pointed out:

“We’re building a house,” he said. “You design it first and then cost it out. We will pay for it.”

The full plan will be released tommorow, and we will post it online when it arrives.

The Globe story is at this link.

Posted in Methuen, State News | 1 Comment

George Carlin Dies

George Carlin
Comedian George Carlin passed yesterday at age 71. Carlin was quite a character, and had created some controversy with his use of profanity on the radio (the seven words routine). He became a counter-culture icon and a pretty big draw wherever he went. As a kid I watched Carlin on an old summer replacement variety show doing his hippy dippy weatherman routine and became a fan for life at age 11. He blazed new comedy paths, and in my estimation stood with Richard Pryor as the two biggest impact comedians of our time. You can be sure that wherever he is now he is causing trouble! Rest in Peace George Carlin.

Added Note: The Washington Post has a wonderful Carlin story posted online at this link.

Posted in National News | 13 Comments

Municipal Relief Package

I have listed below the language that came out of the budget passed by the Senate dealing with the municipal relief package filed by the Merrimack Valley Mayors coalition. With the conference committee poised to report out on the reconciliation we will keep an eyed peeled for this section being adopted. I have a coffee riding on the outcome. The language removing the ability of school committees to veto business consolidations has been changed from our original request.

Section 37M ½. Consultations regarding consolidation of administrative functions with city or town.
For any city or town accepting the provisions of this section, not earlier than December 1st of each alternating year beginning in 2009, and not later than January 31st of the subsequent year, the superintendent of schools for each school district serving such municipality shall meet with the mayor, town manager, or chief municipal officer or his designee for that municipality. The purpose of this meeting shall be to review the fiscal status of the school district budget and to identify opportunities for cost savings and efficiencies and any potential methodologies, including, but not limited to, joint procurement or consolidation of redundant functions. The results of each meeting shall be transmitted to the local legislative body and the local school committee not later than thirty days following the conclusion of such meeting.’
(b) There is hereby established a special commission for the purpose of investigating potential options for the modification of the means by which municipal entities are permitted to join the State Group Insurance Commission, the impacts of such options, the feasibility of such options, and their relative advantages and disadvantages.
Such commission shall consist of the Secretary of Administration and Finance or a designee who shall chair the commission, the executive director of the Group Insurance Commission, three representatives of municipal governments currently serving in an elected or appointed capacity and selected from a list provided by the Massachusetts Municipal Association by the governor, three representatives of public employee unions appointed by the governor, one member appointed by the governor, with actuarial experience in health insurance and three additional members appointed by the governor, one of whom shall represent the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation and two of whom shall represent the citizens of the Commonwealth.
Said Commission shall report its findings, together with legislative recommendations for changes and/or modifications, to the clerks of the House and Senate not later than six months following the passage of this act.
(c) (1) Methodology – Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, the Secretary of Health and Human Services is hereby authorized and directed to, in consultation with the University of Massachusetts, change the methodology by which the Commonwealth seeks reimbursement from the federal Medicaid program for students educated pursuant to Chapter 71B of the General Laws from the current “per diem” format, so-called, to a “fee-for-service” format, so-called.
(2) Certification of Increased Reimbursement – Not later than thirty days following the initial receipt of funds pursuant to the “fee-for-service” methodology and in periods of not more than ninety days thereafter, the Secretary shall certify the amount by which reimbursement received using this methodology exceeds the amount which would have otherwise been received, taking into account inflation and any other relevant factors. Such excess amount shall be deposited into the Special Education Assistance Fund established herein.
(3) There shall be established and set up on the books of the Commonwealth the Special Education Assistance Fund, into which shall be deposited sums resulting from federal Medicaid reimbursement pursuant to subsection (2) of this section.
Not less than seventy-five percent of the total amount in said fund shall be appropriated annually for the purposes of assisting municipalities and regional school districts with the cost of transportation of students provided pursuant to Chapter 71B of the General Laws. Said appropriation shall be made in a form designed to ensure equity among students and local educational authorities by utilizing a methodology based on a uniform percentage of eligible transportation costs to be compensated.
The remainder of said fund shall be available for appropriation in the form of grants of assistance to private institutions providing educational services pursuant to Chapter 766 of the Acts of 1972 and its implementing regulations.
No funds provided in this section shall be considered funding for the purposes of Section 72 of Chapter 44 of the General Laws.
(4) The Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Administration and finance and the Commissioner of the Department of Education, in consultation with the University of Massachusetts, shall develop a system of acquiring from municipalities and regional school districts the information necessary to utilize a fee-for-service method of reimbursement from the federal Medicaid system following the passage of this act and prior to a request for a change in reimbursement methodology to the federal government.
Said system shall be designed to maximize efficiency and minimize the cost and burden of compliance for municipalities and regional school districts.
(d) (1) Section 4A of Chapter 40 of the General Laws is amended by striking out the first sentence of said section and inserting the following new sentence:
“The chief executive officer of a city or town, or a board, committee or officer otherwise authorized by law to execute a contract in the name of a governmental unit, as hereinafter defined, may enter on behalf of such unit into an agreement with one or more other governmental units to perform jointly or for such other unit or units any services, activities or undertakings which any of the contracting unties is authorized by law to perform, if such agreement is authorized by the parties thereto, in a city by the city council with the approval of the mayor, in a town by the Board of Selectmen and in a district by the Prudential Committee; provided, however, that when such agreement involves the expenditures of funds for establishing supplementary education centers and innovative educational programs, the agreement and its termination shall be authorized by the school committee.”
(2) Section 4A of Chapter 40 of the General Laws is amended by striking the last sentence of the first paragraph of said section and inserting the following new sentence:
“The words “governmental unit” as used herein shall mean a city, town, a regional school district, a district as defined in section one A, regional planning commissions, however constituted, regional transit authorities established under the provisions of chapter one hundred and sixty-one B, a water and sewer commission established under the provisions of chapter forty N or of a special law, counties, and a state agency as defined in section one of chapter six A”.
(e) Section 18 of Chapter 32B of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2004 official edition, is hereby amended by striking out the entire section and inserting in place thereof the following new sections:-
“Section 18 (a) In a governmental unit which has accepted the provisions of section ten and which accepts the provisions of this subsection, all retirees, their spouses and dependents insured or eligible to be insured under this chapter, if enrolled in medicare part A at no cost to the retiree, spouse or dependents or eligible for coverage thereunder at no cost to the retiree, spouse or dependents, shall be required to transfer to a medicare extension plan offered by the governmental unit under section eleven C or section sixteen; provided, that benefits under said plan and medicare part A and part B together shall be of comparable actuarial value to those under the retiree’s existing coverage. Each retiree shall provide the governmental unit, in such form as the governmental unit shall prescribe, such information as is necessary to transfer to a medicare extension plan. If a retiree does not submit the information required, he shall no longer be eligible for his existing health coverage. The governmental unit may from time to time request from any retiree, a retiree’s spouse and dependents, proof certified by the federal government of their eligibility or ineligibility for medicare part A and part B coverage. The governmental unit shall pay any medicare part B premium penalty assessed by the federal government on said retirees, spouses and dependents as a result of enrollment in medicare part B at the time of transfer into the medicare health benefits supplemental plan.
This subsection shall take effect in a county, except Worcester county, city, town or district upon its acceptance in the following manner: In a county, by vote of the county commissioners; in a city having a Plan D or Plan E charter, by a majority vote of its city council; in any other city, by vote of its city council, approved by the mayor; in a district, except as hereinafter provided, by vote of the registered voters of the district at a district meeting; in a regional school district, by vote of the regional district school committee; and in a town, either by vote of the town at a town meeting or, by a majority of affirmative votes cast in answer to the following question which shall be printed upon the official ballot to be used at an election of said town – ‘Shall the town require that all retirees, their spouses and dependents who are enrolled in medicare part A at no cost to a retiree, their spouse or dependents, or eligible for coverage thereunder at no cost to a retiree, their spouse or dependents, be required to enroll in a medicare health benefits supplement plan offered by the town?’
Section 18 (b). In a governmental unit which has accepted the provisions of section ten and which accepts the provisions of this subsection, all health benefit eligible retirees who retire after the governmental unit’s acceptance of this subsection, their spouses and dependents insured or eligible to be insured under this chapter, if enrolled in medicare part A at no cost to the retiree, spouse or dependents or eligible for coverage thereunder at no cost to the retiree, spouse or dependents, shall be required to transfer to a medicare extension plan offered by the governmental unit under section eleven C or section sixteen; provided, that benefits under said plan and medicare part A and part B together shall be of comparable actuarial value to those under the retiree’s existing coverage. Each benefit eligible individual who retires after the governmental unit’s acceptance of this subsection shall provide the governmental unit, in such form as the governmental unit shall prescribe, such information as is necessary to transfer to a medicare extension plan. If such a retiree does not submit the information required, the retiree shall no longer be eligible for his existing health coverage. The governmental unit may from time to time request from any retiree who retires after the governmental unit’s acceptance of this subsection, and/or the retiree’s spouse and dependents, proof certified by the federal government of their eligibility or ineligibility for medicare part A and part B coverage. The governmental unit shall pay any medicare part B premium penalty assessed by the federal government on said retirees, spouses and dependents as a result of enrollment in medicare part B at the time of transfer into the medicare health benefits supplemental plan. Notwithstanding anything in this subsection to the contrary, no retiree, their spouse or dependent, shall be required to enroll in medicare part B and a medicare extension plan if said requirement would require the retiree to purchase a separate non-medicare extension plan in order to provide coverage for a non-medicare eligible spouse or dependent.
No retiree, their spouse or dependent, who retires prior to the acceptance of this subsection by a governmental unit, shall be subject to the provisions of this subsection, except as provided herein. Any retiree, their spouse or dependent, retired prior to a governmental unit’s acceptance of this subsection, shall be eligible for benefits under this chapter as if this subsection had not been accepted by the governmental unit, provided that any health benefit eligible retiree, their spouse and dependents insured or eligible to be insured under this chapter, if enrolled in medicare part A at no cost to the retiree, spouse or dependents or eligible for coverage thereunder at no cost to the retiree, spouse or dependents, may voluntarily enroll in a medicare extension plan offered by the governmental unit under section eleven C or section sixteen under the same terms as are available to any retiree, spouse or dependent under this subsection. If any such eligible retiree, their spouse or dependents voluntarily enrolls in such a medicare extension plan, said individual shall no longer be eligible to participate in any other group health insurance benefits available to active employees under this chapter.
This subsection shall take effect in a county, except Worcester county, city, town or district upon its acceptance in the following manner: In a county, by vote of the county commissioners; in a city having a Plan D or Plan E charter, by a majority vote of its city council; in any other city, by vote of its city council, approved by the mayor; in a district, except as hereinafter provided, by vote of the registered voters of the district at a district meeting; in a regional school district, by vote of the regional district school committee; and in a town, either by vote of the town at a town meeting or, by a majority of affirmative votes cast in answer to the following question which shall be printed upon the official ballot to be used at an election of said town – ‘Shall the governmental unit require that all individuals who retire after the governmental unit’s acceptance of this subsection and their spouses and dependents who are enrolled in medicare part A at no cost to a retiree, their spouse or dependents, or eligible for coverage thereunder at no cost to a retiree, their spouse or dependents, be required to enroll in a medicare health benefits supplement plan offered by the governmental unit?’”.
(f) Section 44A of Chapter 149 of the General Laws is hereby amended by striking Section 2 and replacing it with the following:-
“(2)(A) Every contract for the construction, reconstruction, installation, demolition, maintenance or repair of any building by a public agency estimated to cost less than $5,000 shall conform to sound business practices.
(B) Every contract for the construction, reconstruction, installation, demolition, maintenance or repair of any building by a public agency estimated to cost not less than $5,000 but not more than $10,000 shall be awarded to the responsible person offering to perform the contract at the lowest price quotation; provided, however, that the public agency shall seek written price quotations from no fewer than 3 persons customarily providing the work for which the contract is being made available. When seeking written quotations the public agency shall make and keep a record of the names and addresses of all persons from whom price quotations were sought, the names of the persons submitting price quotations and the date and amount of each price quotation.
(C) Every contract for the construction, reconstruction, installation, demolition, maintenance or repair of any building estimated to cost more than $10,000 but not more than $25,000 shall be awarded to the responsible person offering to perform the contract at the lowest price. The public agency shall make public notification of the contract and shall seek written responses from persons who customarily perform such work. The public notification shall include a scope of work statement that defines the work to be performed and provides potential responders with sufficient information regarding the objectives and requirements of the public agency and the time period within which the work is to be completed. For purposes of this subsection “public notification” shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, posting, no less than 2 weeks before the time specified in the notification for the receipt of responses, the contract and scope of work statement on the website of the public agency, on the COMPASS system, so-called, or in the central register established under section 20A of chapter 9, and in a conspicuous place in or near the primary office of the public agency.
(D) Every contract for the construction, reconstruction, installation, demolition, maintenance or repair of any building by a public agency estimated to cost more than $25,000 but not more than $100,000, except for a pumping station to be constructed as an integral part of a sewer construction or water construction project bid under the provisions of section 39M of chapter 30, shall be awarded to the lowest responsible and eligible bidder on the basis of competitive bids publicly opened and read in accordance with the procedure set forth in said section 39M of said chapter 30. The term “pumping station” as used in this section shall mean a building or other structure which houses solely pumps and appurtenant electrical and plumbing fixtures.
(E) Every contract for the construction, reconstruction, installation, demolition, maintenance or repair of any building by a public agency estimated to cost more than $100,000, except for a pumping station to be constructed as an integral part of a sewer construction or water construction project bid under the provisions of section 39M of chapter 30, shall be awarded to the lowest responsible and eligible general bidder on the basis of competitive bids in accordance with the procedure set forth in section 44A to 44H, inclusive.
(F) When the general court has approved the use of an alternative mode of procurement of construction for a project pursuant to section 7E of chapter 29, the awarding authority responsible for procuring construction services for the project shall follow the policies and procedures of this section and of section 44B to 44H, inclusive, to the extent compatible with the mode of construction procurement selected.
(G) Notwithstanding paragraph (E), a public agency may undertake the procurement of modular buildings, in accordance with section 44E. A public agency may procure site work for modular buildings, including but not limited to, construction of foundations, installations, and attachment to external utilities, or any portion of site work, either in combination with the procurement of modular buildings pursuant to section 44E or on the basis of competitive bids pursuant to the paragraph (E). Notwithstanding the paragraph (E), a public agency may procure energy management services in accordance with section 11C of chapter 25A and regulations promulgated thereunder.”
(g) (1) Section 2 of Chapter 30B of the General Laws, as so appearing, is hereby amended, after line 36 by inserting the following:-
“Electric bidding”, the electronic solicitation and receipt of offers to contract for supplies and services. Offers may be accepted and contracts may be entered by use of electronic bidding.
(2) Section 2 of Chapter 30B of the General Laws, as 50 appearing, is hereby amended, after line 90 by inserting the following:-
“Reverse auction”, a competitive online solicitation process for supplies and services in which vendors compete against each other online in real time in an open and interactive environment.
(3) Chapter 30B of the General Laws, as so appearing, is hereby amended by adding after Section 6 the following new section:-
“6A. (a) A chief procurement officer may enter into procurement contracts in the amount of $25,000 or more utilizing reverse auctions for the acquisition of supplies and services. The reverse auction process shall include a specification of an opening date and time when real-time electronic bids may be accepted, and provide that the procedure shall remain open until the designated closing date and time.
(b) All bids on reverse auctions shall be posted electronically on the Internet, updated on a real-time basis, and shall allow registered bidders to lower the price of their bid below the lowest bid on the Internet.
(c) The chief procurement officer shall require vendors to register before the reverse auction opening date and time, and as part of the registration, agree to any terms and conditions and other requirements of the solicitation. The chief procurement officer may require vendors to be pre-qualified prior to placing bids in a reverse auction. The pre-qualification criteria shall include, but not be limited to statements of vendors: financial stability, past performances and professional references. The statement of qualifications shall be signed under pains and penalties of perjury.”
(4) Any mechanism, including but not limited to software, developed by the Operational Services Division for the purpose of conducting reverse auctions by the Commonwealth, shall provide for the utilization of such mechanism by municipalities. The Operational Services Division may assess any municipality utilizing such reverse auction mechanism a reasonable fee, calculated to compensate for any increased cost attributable to such utilization, which shall be credited to the general fund.”

Posted in Methuen, Sports | 12 Comments

Obama Opens Wide Lead

A new Newsweek poll has Barack Obama opening a wide lead on John McCain. The Newsweek poll puts Obama up by fifteen points as well as giving him some other relatively good news. From Newsweek:

The latest numbers on voter dissatisfaction suggest that Obama may enjoy more than one bounce. The new poll finds that only 14 percent of Americans say they are satisfied with the direction of the country. That matches the previous low point on this measure recorded in June 1992, when a brief recession contributed to Bill Clinton’s victory over Bush’s father, incumbent George H.W. Bush. Overall, voters see Obama as the preferred agent of “change” by a margin of 51 percent to 27 percent. Younger voters, in particular, are more likely to see Obama that way: those 18 to 39 favor the Illinois senator by 66 percent to 27 percent. The two candidates are statistically tied among older voters.

Obama is also benefitting from the damaged Republican brand, as Democratic registration once again is substantially higher than Republican.

Obama’s current lead also reflects the large party-identification advantage the Democrats now enjoy—55 percent of all voters call themselves Democrats or say they lean toward the party while just 36 percent call themselves Republicans or lean that way. Even as McCain seeks to gain voters by distancing himself from the unpopular Bush and emphasizing his maverick image, he is suffering from the GOP’s poor reputation among many voters. Still, history provides hope for the GOP. Hugick points out that in May 1988 when the primaries ended, Democrat Michael Dukakis enjoyed a 54 percent to 38 percent lead over George H.W. Bush. But Bush wound up winning handily. “Those results should give people pause,” Hugick says, saying that a substantial number of voters, about 5 percent, have also moved into the undecided column. A significant improvement in the economy, or continued advances in Iraq—an issue McCain has identified with strongly as the senator who championed the “surge” first—could alter the Republican’s fortunes.

While it is obviously very early and McCain’s fortunes could turn Obama’s huge fundraising edge will make a McCain resurgence all the more difficult. Is McCain begining to resemble Bob Dole to you? Read the Newsweek story here.

Posted in National News | 1 Comment