Mitt: What Did I Just Step In?

Whatever it is it sure doesn’t smell that good. Romney, after a big win in FLA, reopened the Willard gaffe machine, stating on CNN that he “wasn’t concerned about the very poor.” Romney, in trying to make the point that his campaign would be focused on middle America, clumsily stated that the “safety net” was there to assist the poor. He also indicated that he would shore up that safety net if he saw holes in it. From a political perspective Romney’s comments simply play into the perception (fact) that he is just a rich guy out of touch. But the main criticism has come not from the left, but from the right.

Over at National Review Online Jonah Golberg just put up a post called “What is Wrong with This Guy?” National Review has been largely supportive of the Romney candidacy. Here is a snippet from Golberg:

But, every time he seems to get into his groove and pull away he says things that make people think he doesn’t know how to play the game. That can be reassuring to some, who take it as proof he’s not another politician. The problem, for others at least, is that because he isn’t a natural politician he breaks the language where it needs to bend. He uses language — “I like to fire people!” “It’s nothing to get angry about” etc — that doesn’t make him seem like an unconventional politician. Rather his language makes him seem like a caricature of a conventionally stiff country club Republican.

Over at Red State Erick Erickson, who has not been supportive, derided the “candidate of National Review” in a post called “The National Review’s Candidate Won’t Stop Digging”. Erickson takes some delight in a “told you so” posting.

This morning Mitt Romney said he wasn’t concerned about the poor. The poor, after all, have food stamps and Medicaid. But don’t worry. If the safety net is broken, Patrician Mitt Romney will fix it so the poor can stay comfortably poor. After all, just look what he did in Massachusetts. The poor can now wait 44 days to get in to see a doctor. Excelsior!

After making sure we all understood the poor were for the Democrats to be worried about, Romney decided to keep digging his hole even bigger. By the end of the day, Jim DeMint had to rebuke him.

The Romney veneer of electability certainly has lost a bit of shine, especially with a group he has struggled to win over; conservatives. I still see Romney as the nominee, but will he be able to withstand the coming assault from the Democrats? The Republican fear is that he will hand the President the very weapons that will be used to defeat him. Based on some of the “Willard gaffes” they may have a valid concern.

http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=politics/2012/02/01/point-romney-poor-safety-net.cnn

This entry was posted in National News and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Mitt: What Did I Just Step In?

  1. Jules Gordon says:

    Your Honor,

    Mitt is not a product of the same world you I live in. However by the time he passes through the gauntlet of frenzied friends,enemies and media types, he will have been well schooled in Politic-speech. He should have the credentials to run a large organization such as the U.S. government.

    We know he a good financial manager, and skilled leader (Olympics) and an experienced Governor (political).

    This Republican primary season is vetting those running for nomination.

    The winner will be quite bloodied as he takes on Obama whose been on campaign mode for the last 2 years.

    Jules

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s