The Boston Globe is reporting today that the vaunted “reform” of the paid police detail system in Massachusetts appears to be dying a slow death. This reform, announced to great fanfare by the top legislative leadership only a short time ago, appears to have been undone by the tremendous lobbying done by police unions. Governor Patrick had pledged reform.
Governor Deval Patrick and the state’s top legislative leaders stood united in March and made a bold proclamation: They would use their combined political muscle to take on powerful police unions and their sacred perk – construction details.
But it did not take the Governor long to backtrack in front of the pressure. From the Globe:
Patrick was the first to publicly back off the tough stance when, just a week after the highly orchestrated news conference, the governor said on WTKK-FM’s monthly “Ask the Governor” radio show, “The more I think about it, the less certain I am that we can fix this top down.”
So the localities will continue to incur higher costs, when in fact a legislative fix that was non-financial could have saved some money. From Michael Widmer:
Given the limitations of the legislation, it can’t be anything dramatic,” said Michael J. Widmer, president of the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation. “By tossing it to the local level, they’ve essentially passed the buck.”
Municipalities would save $36.5 million to $66.5 million a year by replacing most police details with less expensive flaggers, according to a 2004 study by the Beacon Hill Institute. The study estimated that cities and towns spent $93.3 million in police details in 2003.
Our Senator, Steve Baddour, expressed some optimism but acknowleged the heavy pressure:
“I now understand why reform sometimes doesn’t rise to the surface,” said Senator Steven A. Baddour, a Methuen Democrat who was chief sponsor of the legislation and remains optimistic that it will bring about reforms. “It was the most difficult two weeks I’ve had in the Legislature.”
If the final product does not allow details to be reformed at the local level outside of collective bargaining then from a local perspective nothing will have been achieved.
“There ultimately will need to be change so that communities won’t have to negotiate changes to use civilian flaggers,” said Geoff Beckwith, executive director of the Massachusetts Municipal Association. “Otherwise, what happens is the unions ask for other concessions like pay increases or additional benefits in exchange.”
I am glad I did not wager any coffee with Jules over this one.