Todays Tribune has a story on the expense of snow plowing in Methuen titled “plowed streets a luxury”. The gist of the story is that Council Chairman Phil Lahey, a retired DPW worker who plowed streets for many years, maintains that:
I don’t think we can afford to do the super duper job that we’ve been doing
Chairman Lahey’s viewpoint is that we are using to much hired equipment (contractors for actual plowing and rented sanders) With the increased expense of salt Chairman Lahey also points out that we sand and salt areas that were not done when he was plowing.
The city, for the most part, sanded only the main streets, hills and intersections about ten or twelve years ago, Lahey said. But now they sand and salt streets “that could be so levelthat you could put a golf ball on them and it wouldn’t roll,” he said.
His essential point comes right at the end if the Tribune story.
I’m just saying,”Guys…We’re just not going to be able to sand and salt every single street in Methuen.”
As far as my response goes I said in the story that we will listen to any proposal that will save us money, and we have agreed to review snow removal. We have pointed out the tremendous increase in commodity prices, with salt going from $42 per ton to $58.50 per ton along with the tremendous spike in gasoline costs. We have also pointed out the increase in road miles that we are responsible for because of residential growth in Methuen. And additionally we must factor in our ability to get our public safety vehicles in and out of any spot in Methuen. As we look at this proposal judging which roads ought not to be salted and sanded becomes a real problem, with the attendant political questions that will center around such decision making. Finally we have issued a five year study that compares our costs to those in surrounding communities, and have found that we were at the low end of that scale. So as we evaluate costs in this area I will not utilize outright service cutbacks in this area as a method of cost reduction. What do you think?