The Conference Committee of the Legislature dealing with the separate House and Senate Pension reform efforts reported out a bill in the last couple of days, and it contained the deeper reforms that were contained in the original Senate bill. (Reforms enacted to apply to existing personnel.) And those reforms took out some of the most prominent abuses that the existing system had promulgated. The Boston Globe highlighted the changes:
Removing a provision that credits a full year of service to employees after they have worked as little as one day in that year.
Preventing elected officials from claiming a “termination allowance” that has been granted after they have failed to win reelection.
Changing the current accidental disability retirement benefit for individuals who are injured while temporarily filing in for their supervisor. Some firefighters in Boston have collected pension benefits based on their bosses’ higher pay level after they were injured on the job while subbing for them.
Limiting the definition of “compensation” to wages and salary and specifically excluding housing benefits, annuities, or the use of motor vehicles. This would prevent presidents at the state’s public colleges and universities from counting housing and transportation allowances as compensation.
Eliminating a current provision that allows certain officials to establish pension credits for holding unpaid jobs.
And while everyone agreed that this change was badly needed, it is clear that it is only a first step. The Massachusetts Pension system is in tatters.
State lawmakers characterized the pension legislation as a first step, one that largely addresses the symbolic abuses that resonate in the public, and they vowed to make further changes in the future that could save the state substantial money. The legislation calls for establishing a commission to review broader changes and issue a report by Sept. 1.
The press announcement of the conference report really highlighted the bruised feelings that still exist between the big three. Therese Murray treated Governor Patrick like he was radioactive waste. And although the Governor seems to be taking more than a few bows here the real credit belongs to Senate President Murray, whose chamber produced a bill that applies to current employees, and held the line when the House tried to limit reforms to future employees. As has been noted elsewhere the Governor did not produce a pension reform bill.
