One of the new items to come out of the state budget is the idea of a commission to study municipal budgeting and monitor local spending. It is covered in todays Eagle Tribune, where we learn that the state is concerned over municipal spending and all of the state aid that is sent to cities and towns. From the Eagle Tribune, David Guarino, for the Speaker.
His spokesman, Guarino, said the current situation is unsustainable.
“When local aid increases 2.3 percent, and they give out contracts (with raises of) 6 and 7 percent, that’s not feasible,” he said.
Dave is pretty good at math. But with the state under continuing scrutiny for gross fiscal mismanagement I am not sure I want to be tutored at that school. I look forward to that commission convening and looking into non-financial ways to help municipalities. How about removing the state imposed prohibition (through school committee veto) on consolidations between school and city. I wonder if the new commission will figure out that one body costs less than two or three. How about removing the seventy percent poison pill for cities and towns joining the GIC? Maybe someone should tell Dave Guarino that health care escalation has been killing cities and towns, and that giving unions additional leverage through that seventy percent number means that they will likely receive additional pay benefits so that cities and towns may receive their assent to join the GIC. I wonder if we need a commission to have the legislature mandate that in order to receive cherry sheet money no municipality could give collective bargaining agreements beyond 2.5 percent. Do we need a commission for that? I look forward to the workings of this commission, and hope some real good can come out of it. Read the Tribune article here.