As you all know the voters of the State decriminalized the possession of marijuana in the last election cycle. Since that election there have been some questions raised, by law enforcement officials and others, about the impacts of the law in certain areas. The Herald did a story some time back about what effect it might have on the Human Resources policies of governmental entities that have job penalties for marijuana use. The State Executive Office of Public Safety and Attorney General Martha Coakley have suggested that cities and towns consider some added penalty for public usage of marijuana. I agree, and have filed legislation that would up the penalty for public usage from the existing one hundred dollar fine (for possesion) to a prospective $300 fine for usage in a public area. I have already received some complaint that I am trying to alter the results of the referendum through local ordinance. Upon close examination that argument simply goes up in smoke.
The main thrust of the law is to put some teeth into an ordinance that will protect our public areas, most prominently our parks and playgrounds from people thinking the new law gives them carte blanche to smoke marijuana in these areas. We have many families that use our park system and playgrounds, and we intend these areas to be alcohol and drug free, notwithstanding the critics who apparently think the new state law covers all contingencies. Simply stayed, it doesn’t. Beverage alcohol is an apt comparision. That product, (beer, wine, spirits) is legal. But open container laws go beyond the laws on who may possess it and prohibit the open usage of such products in public areas. Yes we take that extra step and say that it is not in the public interest that beverage alcohol be consumed in parks and playgrounds. And I guess you could safely say that such laws are an infringement of your right to use a legal product, and you would be correct. But the larger public interest requires it, and the general consensus is that these laws are correct. That is all we are doing with the newly decriminalized marijuana.
Finally, for those who have assigned revenue motivation to this proposal you should think again. If you do not openly use this product in the listed areas then there is no added penalty. We are not looking to raise more money or change the results of a democratically decided referendum. We are simply restating the City of Methuen’s belief that our parks and playgrounds will remain drug and alcohol free. I am willing to debate anyone who thinks otherwise. In the meantime I will be looking out of my City Hall window to see if Cheech and Chong have arrived to picket.