The House vote to hike the sales tax to 6.25 percent is causing some major political ripples on Beacon Hill, with both the Speaker and the Senate President expressing astonishment and outrage that the Governor would be critical of the Legislature. The exchanges between the Big Three were pretty tough and extensive, with the Legislature defending against Patrick’s charges of inaction and watered down reform. Patrick stepped it up a notch with new threats to veto either the Pension Bill or the Transportation Reform bill currently in conference. From the State House News Service:
Patrick made his comments Monday in an interview with WBUR reporter Martha Bebinger. Asked whether he would veto the Legislature’s pension or transportation bills if he deemed the reforms inadequate, Patrick said “you bet.” “I’m not interested in some papered over victory, something that is halfway there that we can claim is reform and then move on,” he said, according to a transcript of his remarks. “I’m not about fighting with the Legislature. It’s about fighting for our values and priorities.”
As the process moves forward there were some interesting developments yesterday.
The House, utilizing revenues from the sales tax increase, put $205 million back into the local aid account. I believe that would translate to about a million dollars over the House Ways and Means number for Methuen.
The Senate President said that FY2009 benchmarks were going to be off by $400 million or more. Neither Legislative branch has taken any steps to deal with the FY2009 shortfall. It will likely have to come out of the State rainy day fund.
Senate Ways and Means Chair Steve Panagiotakos seemed to indicate that the Senate would go along with a sales tax increase of some magnitude, and I saw Senate President Murray say that additional revenues may be needed beyond the sales tax.
Michael Widmer’s Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation has produced a short sales tax primer that deals with revenue estimates and state to state comparisions. I have attached it below. Widmer gives an estimate for FY2010 of $905 million in increased revenue for the 25% increase in the sales tax, which is in line with legislative revenue estimates. I had questioned the $900 million dollar figure, but Widmer’s estimates have been pretty reliable.
The Beacon Hill Institute has produced an anaysis of a sales tax hike to 6%, and that study says it will cost 10,000 jobs and have the Commonwealth lose 42 million dollars of business investment. That study is below.
The Tribune slammed local reps who voted in favor of the sales tax hike pretty hard. The Tribune editorial link is below.
The Globe, who had expressed some editorial support for a sales tax hike this week, shifted gears somewhat and supported the Governor’s call for reforms. The Globe editorial highlighted two items that the Legislature will apparently fund with some of the additional revenues. First, the Quinn Bill at $50 million. The second would be an elimination of the House budget provision increasing the percentage paid by state employees for health insurance from 20 percent to 30 percent. The Globe was heavily critical of both of those items, as well as legislative inaction on the other reform items. That editorial is linked below.
Read the Tribune editorial here.
Read the Globe editorial here.